Tuesday, 23 November 2010

ESSAY PLAN 2 + GENERAL NOTES

BACKROADS AND INROADS: ESSAY PLAN *2



BACKROADS AND INROADS:

THE LOW-BUDGET SHOCKER AS INDUSTRY CALLING CARD

ESSAY PLAN *2



INTRO


Themes + ideas

How social and economic context shapes films


Prior productions inform + shape reactions to them:

2001 – Star Wars – Star Crash + Buck Rogers

Metropolis – Blade Runner

I Walked With A Zombie – Night Of The Living Dead / Dawn Of The Dead – 28 Days Later / Dawn Of The Dead remake


Reactions to/Influences of: TEXT

Reactions to/Influences of: THEME

Effects of constraints: budget and facilities



1st time film makers tailor product to their means; cut their cloth accordingly.

Most people don’t – can’t afford to – make Star Wars or ID4 as their first project – they make a more practical, cost effective feature



KEY TEXTS


THE EVIL DEAD (1982):

Textual Influences:

Night Of The Living Dead , Texas Chain Saw Massacre, Last House On The Left, Dawn Of The Dead, Lovecraft / Necronomicon


Thematic Influences:

Consumerism (Dawn), Rise of the yuppie & corporate culture, old vs new, ancient vs modern, language and literacy, youthful abandon – tape + ouija board


Budget & Facilities:

Within The Woods: super 8 32min, 16mm, 3yrs, $150,000 budget, local/private investors, 6 principals, 1 location, fx, moving cameras, decent equipment, stop motion, AMBITIOUS!



THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT (1999):

Textual Influences:

NOLD, Evil Dead, Last Broadcast, Don’t Look Back, European/Arthouse movies


Thematic Influences:

Ecology, man + technology vs nature, modernity vs tradition (old + new worlds clash), youthful abandon + repercussions


Budget & Facilities:

3 principals, open woodlands, found locations, wood/wicker/stone sculptures, video/16mm, no fx, little production design/props work



PARANORMAL ACTIVITY (2007-9):

Textual Influences:

NOLD, The Haunting, Poltergeist, Blair Witch, The Exorcist


Thematic Influences:

Reality TV, prevalence of CCTV/monitoring, youthful abandon (Micah is derisive and incorrectly assumes his ability to tackle the problem and his invulnerability, whereas the professional they call in fears the demon and leaves)


Budget & Facilities:

HD DV, director’s own home, 2 principals, limited digital fx, static camera/occasional handheld

ESSAY PLAN 2 + GENERAL NOTES

BACKROADS AND INROADS: ESSAY PLAN *2

BACKROADS AND INROADS:

THE LOW-BUDGET SHOCKER AS INDUSTRY CALLING CARD

ESSAY PLAN *2

INTRO

Themes + ideas

How social and economic context shapes films

Prior productions inform + shape reactions to them:

2001 – Star Wars – Star Crash + Buck Rogers

Metropolis – Blade Runner

I Walked With A Zombie – Night Of The Living Dead / Dawn Of The Dead – 28 Days Later / Dawn Of The Dead remake

Reactions to/Influences of: TEXT

Reactions to/Influences of: THEME

Effects of constraints: budget and facilities

1st time film makers tailor product to their means; cut their cloth accordingly.

Most people don’t – can’t afford to – make Star Wars or ID4 as their first project – they make a more practical, cost effective feature

KEY TEXTS

THE EVIL DEAD (1982):

Textual Influences:

Night Of The Living Dead , Texas Chain Saw Massacre, Last House On The Left, Dawn Of The Dead, Lovecraft / Necronomicon

Thematic Influences:

Consumerism (Dawn), Rise of the yuppie & corporate culture, old vs new, ancient vs modern, language and literacy, youthful abandon – tape + ouija board

Budget & Facilities:

Within The Woods: super 8 32min, 16mm, 3yrs, $150,000 budget, local/private investors, 6 principals, 1 location, fx, moving cameras, decent equipment, stop motion, AMBITIOUS!

BLAIR WITCH (1999):

Textual Influences:

NOLD, Evil Dead, Last Broadcast, Don’t Look Back, European/Arthouse movies

Thematic Influences:

Ecology, man + technology vs nature, modernity vs tradition (old + new worlds clash), youthful abandon + repercussions

Budget & Facilities:

3 principals, open woodlands, found locations, wood/wicker/stone sculptures, video/16mm, no fx, little production design/props work

PARANORMAL ACTIVITY (2007-9):

Textual Influences:

NOLD, The Haunting, Poltergeist, Blair Witch, The Exorcist

Thematic Influences:

Reality TV, prevalence of CCTV/monitoring, youthful abandon (Micah is derisive and incorrectly assumes his ability to tackle the problem and his invulnerability, whereas the professional they call in fears the demon and leaves)

Budget & Facilities:

HD DV, director’s own home, 2 principals, limited digital fx, static camera/occasional handheld

ART AND THE VACUUM

Art is not made in a vacuum.

Whether it is literature, music, watercolour, oils or photography, all art is affected by what came before it and also the social context it was created in; it is both action and reaction. The best art not only has something to say for itself but is a comment on its social context and the world around it, and is also informed by its peers and predecessors.


Whether consciously or not, the world of the creative artist has a major impact on his work, from social and political concerns to his influences and preferences. Even his personal circumstances all have an effect on what is created, both as a reaction to his world, and as a direct consequence of who and where he is.


And perhaps nowhere can this be seen as acutely as in the world of film and film-makers.

Because of the visual and collaborative nature of film making it is perhaps easier to see how the circumstances of creating this art have affected the content and methodology than it would be if we looked at an artist in his studio, or a writer sitting at his desk. With film, so many factors and outside influences affect the final product that we can more easily see how the end product was reached.


Except for the likes of Cecil B. Demille, budgetary constraints and the interference and influence of the studios and their attendant executives have always affected what is filmed and how it is filmed. With very little money or facilities one cannot produce a “Star Wars” on the weekends.

One can, however, make something fairly similar to “Friday The 13th”.


On a practical level, one does not have easy access to special effects facilities, soundstages, production designers, construction crews, casts of thousands, costume and wardrobe departments, creature workshops, spaceships or alien worlds, or the means to create facsimiles thereof. What one does almost certainly have access to is a group of friends and collaborators, houses and homes, open woodlands and countryside, “prosumer” camera and editing equipment and cheap fake blood.


There is no use writing a complex effects sequence relying on digital trickery, stop motion and compositing if those means are not open to you. Making a virtue out of the limitations before you is something that when done smartly grabs the attention of fans and critics alike, as we will see from the three films and their case-histories that I shall concentrate on here; Sam Raimi’s “The Evil Dead” (1981), Daniel Myrick & Eduardo Sanchez’ “The Blair Witch Project” (1999) and Orel Peli’s “Paranormal Activity” (2009).


There is something inherently “chicken and egg” about these films and the low-budget horror movie in particular; does the budget affect the product or does the product affect the budget?

This is something I shall investigate in more detail later.


Of course, there is much more going on within these movies than their budgetary limitations; they are products of their influences and the movies that came before them; they are products of the technology that made them and that feeds into and shapes the narrative; and they are products of, and reactions to, the times and society they were made in. They reflect and comment upon the state of the world in microcosm and macrocosm at that time, and so provide, in the way that art does, a unique snapshot of the world that shaped them.

Tuesday, 16 November 2010

BACKROADS AND INROADS: ESSAY PLAN

BACKROADS AND INROADS:

THE LOW-BUDGET SHOCKER AS INDUSTRY CALLING CARD


ESSAY PLAN


INTRO

An introduction to the ideas and precedent of low budget horror film making; the film makers, the audience, the business track record. Also the reasons why film makers choose this route and how the product is affected by the limitations of the production, and how this has also created a new genre in itself.


MID

A detailed study of three successful examples of this genre – three films that have helped to define and redefine the genre; Sam Raimi and The Evil Dead (1982), Eduardo Sanchez and Daniel Myrick’s The Blair Witch Project (1999) and Oren Peli’s Paranormal Activity (2007-9).

Focusing on the historical precedents for these movies; how technology contributed to the storytelling process and the films that were made, how the movies are a product of the limitations of low-budget production, and how the experiences of these film makers and the lessons they learned can be used to inform my own film production.


KEY AREAS OF INVESTIGATION:

History and influences.

Technology and its effects.

Finance and feasibility.

Story, form and practicality; how the product is shaped by the production methods.

The effects on the film maker's careers.

The effects on the industry and what comes next.


SUMMARY/CONCLUSION

An evaluation of how the films were affected and shaped by their means of production, and how this will continue to develop and affect future productions, including my own.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Pt.1

I find writing these blogs difficult to get into every time and will find most anything else to do first, including cleaning and tidying my house. In which case, why does it still look like a bomb site..?

So I'm currently researching for both my essay and the film I will later direct.
My thoughts are currently on the side of the low-key spooky style of horror rather than the out and out "fx-in-your-face" type of project. TRANSFER has a more out there style and tone, with five main characters, multiple locations and considerable prosthetic (and possibly some CG) effects. It's not a project that is beyond the realms of low-budget film making by any means, but it is reasonably complex. And it still needs drastic rewriting to cut it down to size.

Maybe it's because I was recently blown away by Paranormal Activity 2, but as always, I am favouring the slow-burn, creeping dread, subtle supernatural horror route. Hell, at this point, I'm even considering rewriting THE MIRROR GROUP as my final film, a script of mine which has already been filmed twice by my peers at university this year. None of them seemed to quite "get it" or do it justice, a fact I checked by having a few friends watch both versions and give me their opinions. Maybe it's a flaw in my writing, but as far as I can tell, everything that should be on-screen IS on the page. So why do people miss these things? Beats me, but it's why I have always wanted to become a writer/director; why should I trust my vision to the interpretation of others?
Call me a control freak if you will, but I work hard on plot, structure and all of the other components that make storytelling and scripts as strong as they can be, so why hand them over to people who seem to little understand these concepts, let alone care about them.
But we digress...

So my thoughts turn also to the as-yet unwritten SHADOW PEOPLE project, something that is percolating in my mind and won't let go.
I know already that it concerns Shadow People, the well documented paranormal phenomena of seeing shadowy figures at the periphery of one's vision, only for them to disappear when focused upon. These are supposedly the most common type of paranormal activity (akkk!!) encountered, and are conspicuously overlooked in literature and film. Having been aware of this phenomena and fascinated by it since I was a kid, to see it touched upon in both Paranormal Activity movies was something that touched a nerve in both of them. The only issue now is to weave a solid story about this in a ten-minute time-frame.
So we have the Shadow People phenomena, we have a protagonist becoming aware of these apparitions in his (or her) own home, we have an escalation of these events and finally a switcheroo payoff, which mustn't seem contrived in its execution.

I'm currently also reading up on the literature concerning the supernatural, and obviously consulting the web as a vast resource of paranormal research, and some amount of paranormal bunk. My mind is also turning toward events that I and my family/partner have witnessed. Now don''t get me wrong here, I'm a born skeptic on this sort of thing and being the sort of practical, pragmatic, scientifical chappie that I am, I don't actually BELIEVE in any of this nonsense for more than a second (as me after midnight when I'm alone and the lights flicker and I may tell you something different!). That said, I know what I've SEEN and HEARD in a house I used to own, and I also know what my nearest and dearest have experienced for themselves, and these are not people who pitch up at the Derek Acorah roadshow. There is weirdness out there, and I know of far too many unexplainable things to completely discount this stuff. Yet still, my logical mind refutes it.
And perhaps this is the crux of the tale I wish to tell; one man's refusal to accept and believe and the trouble this lands him in.

Added to this research is my research into low-budget horror movies.
I am reading books on the topic and studying the films and film makers who have come before me. And in all of this, I find myself drawn to the ultra low budget movies and what makes them work, and perhaps more importantly, what effects the lack of money and resources has had on the material produced.

My focus seems to fall primarily on Sam Raimi and the original Evil Dead film - he made this ULTRA low-budget with friends over the space of three years, on the weekends, and with money invested by local businessmen. The technical skill and outright energy that this movie displays is always an inspiration, and some 31 years after it began filming, it remains a fan favourite and genre classic to this day, having been reissued on DVD and BluRay within the last month or so.

The other movies that I am focusing on for my research and as a rough template are 1999's The Blair Witch Project and 2007's Paranormal Activity. Both of these movies are again ultra low budget affairs which eschew obvious special effects for the more effective chills of suggestion and dread. They are products of their time, embracing the latest developments in Hi Def consumer equipment to make their films walking around deserted woods for a week, and within their own homes. Minimal cast, locations and effects sell the verisimilitude of these movies, and work within the contexts of their stories. And the question to be asked is undoubtedly how much the limitations of finance, equipment, cast and crew affected the stories that were told and the films that were produced.

There is something of a chicken and egg argument to these types of films, yet the practicalities of film production will always shape the style, content and narrative of these types of guerilla production. Add to this the social context of when and where these movies are made, and you have a very interesting area of research.

Coming next:
More research, more development, more sleepless nights with the lights switched on...

Saturday, 6 November 2010

BEGINNINGS

It's late on in 2010 and the days are getting shorter, wetter and colder. It's a bitter-sweet time for me, moving from the warmth and brightness of summer, to the cold dark winter nights. I love the carefree sunshine of the summer months, but I also look forward to the creeping darkness of the winter months; the way autumn steals the leaves from the trees, reducing them to twisted, clawing phantoms, and the feeling that as the days get shorter, you may become engulfed in a permanent night.

We wrap up warm when we go out and heat our houses when we're inside, preferably with a roaring fireplace. We constantly shuttle from the chill to the cosy, and that's a lovely feeling as the nights draw in; winter brings us all together.

I also love the knowledge that before Christmas and the end of the old year, soon will come my personal favourite nights of the year, better even than birthdays; the twin celebrations of Hallowe'en and Bonfire Night.

Split a few days apart on October 31st and November 5th, these celebrations have resonated with me from childhood, with their macabre imagery and the first chills of autumn/winter in the air. To watch horror movies by candlelight with the people you love is surely one of the sweetest feelings and never fails to give me butterflies as the day draws nearer. Then, less than a week later, to congregate with complete strangers around a blazing bonfire in a dark field, with the cold breeze nipping at your nose is another delight more easily shared than explained. These are my nights of the year. Dark, cold, spooky, cosy and invariably incredibly happy.

My love for these nights and their own very particular ambience reflects a lot about the things I grew up loving, much to the chagrin of the parental figures around me. As a kid I was, if not obsessed by horror, then a major devotee. Some children get that buzz from ball-games and sports, others from building things from whatever they can find - car parts, junk or Meccano sets.
Me? I always, ALWAYS loved films.
TV, yes, music and radio, sure, they've always been a big player in my life. I've always been obsessed by what we now post-modernically refer to as "MEDIA". Music, books, art, TV, radio, music have always held me in their particular thrall, but perhaps none more so than the humble movie. That beautiful feeling of the lucid dream as you give yourself to somebody else's construction of the world. That fleeting glimpse into another life, another place, another reality that the best movies do so well, and even the worst ones can even manage. It is pure magic, and has held me in its spell since I can't recall.

As with many kids, including the big one I've inevitably grown up to be, the cinema of the fantastic has always drawn me strongest. What we all unthinkingly term as sci-fi and horror movies are what drew me in the deepest. The infinite possibilities and imaginitive speculation of the science-fiction genre, in print and on the screen, gripped and thrilled me, and if I'm honest, still does. Anything's possible with sci-fi, only the limits of your imagination can bind you, and please be sure; I can imagine A LOT!
But inextricably linked with this is my overriding love for the horror movie. That illicit frisson of the forbidden offered for your enjoyment; the darkness, the supernatural, the gothic. Death, murder, revenge, blood, madness, mayhem, the creeping unknown, the terror of the infinite ages.
The feeling of witnessing ones own terror, pain and inevitably, death, albeit by proxy is a heady pleasure that has always fascinated mankind. That we choose to feel this in the company of strangers in a darkened room is in itself a fascinating phenomenon. And that children the world over, too young to be allowed admission to these communal acts of controlled fear, will sit alone and experience them for themselves at home, on video, DVD and web stream, bringing that scary other into the safety of their own domain, and tainting it, even if only temporarily is a powerful testament to the fact that as humans we need this vicarious thrill, even at a young age.

My earliest memories, I suppose, are all inextricably linked with these genres, from dancing with my sister in front of the TV on a Sunday afternoon as the thrilling Barry Gray theme music to Space 1999 filled the house, to being terrified by the sight of Charles Laughton as Quasimodo when they shown Hunchback at Saturday tea-time, a movie infinitely more terrifying to my young mind than the Universal horrors I would sit up to watch later that night.
I still get the same warm feelings as when I was younger when I watch Karloff stagger across the screen, Bela Lugosi wax lyrical about the "creatures of the night" and the music they make, and the pathos of Lon Chaney Jr and his slicked back do, furry feet and denim shirt creeping through a fog-bound sound stage.
I recall quite clearly being unable to concentrate at school when I was only four or five, as I knew that King Kong was being shown on BBC2 at 6.30 that evening. We stopped off at my grandma's and I was beside myself in my attempts to get my mum heading for home so I didn't miss a single second of the film - and this at about four in the afternoon.

Then, consider that moment at five years old, again sat in the darkened, threadbare theatre in old Oldham town, when a huge looking Blockade Runner sprinted across the screen, only to be followed by the immense rumbling mass of an Imperial Star Destroyer. I can still clearly remember that feeling of being pinned back in my seat with sheer awe. I was five years old, man; what chance did I stand? Like the rest of my peers, and as i was later to discover, my peers of all ages, I was hooked and my life would never quite be the same again. I was now a child of the Star Wars era.

And dammit, we were there first, and we were so damned lucky.

So where is all of this idle chit-chat and reminiscing leading us?
Well, what the hell was I saying..?
Oh, yeah..

So from the earliest age, my life has been filled with media "stuff" and genre icons in particular. So cut to me a few short years ago, having that same old discussion with myself; where am I going, what am I doing, what do I want to be when I grow up? And in your mid-30s that's maybe not the coolest conversation to be having with yourself, let alone your significant others. And the answer, as ever, after I'd sifted through the second bests and also rans, was that I wanted to make movies. The sort of movies that I love, and that resonate with me. The sort of movies that you just don't see much anymore. I have always wanted - no, NEEDED! - to write and direct. I never had any option, it's just who I am. I just always lucked out on the practicalities of that.
So with the support of my nearest and dearest, I took the step of changing my working hours to part-time and signing up for a degree that would enable me to fulfill those ambitions and forge a career in the industry.


Now, two years into the course, I am about to embark on my final year. This is the big one – make or break. Everything I have learned so far at university and everything I’ve planned to do comes to a head in this next 12 months. I need to write and direct, arrange and co-ordinate, plan and execute projects which show off my skills and hint at my promise in this field, giving me a decent showreel and a portfolio of work.

So for my final dissertation, I get to write and direct my own ten-minute movie of my own choice. Carte blanche. Anything goes. Whatever I choose.

And what do I choose?

What else but a short horror film? It’s just who I am.


Best yet, I have scripts written already for a couple of possible films – one, TRANSFER, needs to be cut literally down to half size, whereas the other, THE MIRROR GROUP, needs a bit of bulking up and rethinking from the current 5-7 minute script that it is, although I worry that the idea would really benefit from being 15-20 minutes in length. There is a third idea I have been mulling over for a while now, provisionally entitled THE SHADOW PEOPLE, which I have yet to write or make notes on, but there are already ideas and plot points forming the more I think about it.


And even before any of these things are decided on, there is the matter of my critical research project, which should help to inform and shape the material for the final film. Again, this leaves things wide open, with big decisions to be made. So naturally, I go back to who I am, what interests me, what themes and issues resonate within me, and also what just plain fires me up?


I have spent a lifetime (or with the amount of movie watching I’ve done, several normal lifetimes!) watching movies. Many of them science-fiction influenced, many of them horror base, and some a combination of the two.

For example, Ridley Scott’s ALIEN will always for me be the better of the movies of that franchise, with its melding of pure sci-fi and horror elements to make a scary movie with a realistic, and very considered, view of the future. It is famously referred to as a “haunted house movie in space”, whereas its sequel, the ingeniously entitled ALIENS is really a Vietnam war thriller set in a facsimile of Scott’s world. And you truly can tell a lot about a person from their favourite of these two movies, in a Beatles and The Stones kinda way.


Now this is all good and well in theory, but where does it get me to where I want to be? Nowhere fast, in honesty. I don’t have funds or resources to make a large scale, big budget sci-fi horror movie, not even on a Roger Corman or Ed Wood level.


So my mind then starts to think back to the people who have come before; my favourite film makers and how they got started, and how this could help to shape and inform my movie and the process of its creation.

I began by drawing up a list of directors whose work I loved, liked or was at least passingly familiar with, and their low-budget genre movies as calling cards for the industry. It read pretty much as follows:


DAVID CRONENBERG:

Stereo, Crimes Of The Future, Shivers, Rabid, The Brood, Scanners


JOHN CARPENTER:

Assault On Precinct 13, Halloween, The Fog, Escape From New York, The Thing, Christine


RIDLEY SCOTT:

The Duellists, Alien, Blade Runner, Legend


STEVEN SPIELBERG:

Rod Serling’s Night Gallery, Columbo, Duel, Something Evil, Jaws,

Close Encounters Of The Third Kind, E.T.,

Poltergeist (controversial, that one, but the evidence speaks for itself!)


GEORGE LUCAS:

THX-1138, American Graffiti, Star Wars


JAMES CAMERON:

Piranha II: The Flying Killers, The Terminator, Aliens, The Abyss,

Terminator 2: Judgment Day, Avatar


GEORGE A. ROMERO:

Night Of The Living Dead, Martin, Season Of The Witch, The Crazies, Dawn Of The Dead,

Day Of The Dead


TOBE HOOPER:

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, Funhouse, Salem’s Lot,

Poltergeist (he was at least on-set most of the time!), Lifeforce, Invaders From Mars


WES CRAVEN:

Last House On The Left, The Hills Have Eyes, Eaten Alive, Deadly Blessing, Swamp Thing,

A Nightmare On Elm Street, Scream


SEAN S. CUNNINGHAM:

Friday The 13th, Last House On The Left, House, Deepstar Six


SAM RAIMI:

The Evil Dead (series), Crimewave, Darkman, Spider-Man (series)


ROGER CORMAN:

The Raven, The Terror, The Haunted Palace, X, The Masque of the Red Death,

The Tomb of Ligeia, Deathsport, Battle Beyond the Stars, Frankenstein Unbound


NORMAN J. WARREN:

Satan's Slave, Terror, Prey, Inseminoid, Bloody New Year


PETE WALKER:

Die Screaming, The Flesh and Blood Show, House of Whipcord, Frightmare, Schizo


ELI ROTH:

Cabin Fever, Hostel, Hostel: Part II, The Funhouse 3D


ALEXANDRE AJA:

Switchblade Romance, The Hills Have Eyes, Mirrors, Piranha


CLIVE BARKER:

Hellraiser, Nightbreed, Lord of Illusions, Tortured Souls


NEILL BLOMKAMP:

District 9, Alive In Joburg, Yellow, Tempbot


DANIEL MYRICK & EDUARDO SANCHEZ:

The Blair Witch Project


OREN PELI:

Paranormal Activity


PETER JACKSON:

Bad Taste, Braindead, Meet The Feebles, Heavenly Creatures, The Frighteners, Lord Of The Rings Trilogy, King Kong



Some of these names will be familiar to households the world over, others only recognised by horror fans and movie buffs. All share the same thing in common; one or more of their first movies was made as a low-budget genre piece, and for the most part, as budgets increased, they stayed faithful to their genre roots, working primarily within the boundaries of horror and science fiction.


My question, then is this; why is the low-budget horror movie such a well established way into the industry? How did these film-makers get the break with their projects? How did they go about setting up the production and eventually the distribution for these projects? How have they built upon these foundations to create long lasting careers? And how can I apply the benefit of their joint experience and knowledge to help me craft and produce my own low-bugdet horror movies?


Okay, that’s a whole bunch of questions, but I think pretty valid ones.

So here’s the starting point for my research, and over the coming weeks and months, I’ll update this blog to reflect my findings and thoughts, my progress and setbacks, and the ultimate outcome of my horror movie project.


Keep posted, and keep watching the skies.